Skip to content

Product · Paměť

Company memory you can ask.

Paměť sits on top of the systems your company already uses and answers questions from what they contain — with the quotation, the email and the meeting note behind every answer. In Czech, Slovak or English.

Book a demoSee how Paměť works
Octopus MemoryPaměťDemo workspace
EN

Ask your company: What did we last quote Novatek and why didn't it close?

AnswerGrounded in your company's records
Confidence: High4 sourcesTime span: Sep–Oct 2025

The most recent quotation for Novatek was sent on 14 September 2025 for the Warehouse Automation project (Q-2025-0914). It covered implementation, WMS–ERP integration and a 24-month support package.

Based on the project correspondence, the main reason the opportunity did not close was the implementation timeline. Novatek wanted deployment within eight weeks, while the proposed timeline was approximately twelve. Price was discussed but was not the deciding factor.

The CRM opportunity was marked as lost on 3 October 2025 with the note “revisit Q1 — client open to phased delivery next year”.

Sources

People

Projects

Example data. Companies, people and documents shown here are fictional.

Unified company memory

Everything the company knows about a client, in one place.

Today the story of a client is split across a mailbox, a SharePoint folder, a Teams channel and a CRM record. Paměť treats them as one account memory.

  • One memory, many systems

    Email, documents, chats, CRM records and spreadsheets are read as one body of knowledge — not as five separate search boxes.

  • Records stay where they are

    Paměť reads the systems you already have. Nothing is migrated or re-filed, and nobody has to change how they work.

  • Linked, not just indexed

    A client is connected to its projects, the people who worked on them and the records they left behind. Reach any one of them and you reach the rest.

Account memory

Demo workspace · Example data

Novatek

Client since 2023

Logistics & distribution

Projects · 1
Warehouse Automation2025 · Opportunity — not closed
People · 2
Anna NovákováAccount Director
Martin KrálSolutions Engineer
Records · 4
Quotation · SharePoint
Meeting notes · Teams
Email thread · Outlook
CRM record · CRM
SystemsSharePointTeamsOutlookCRM

14 Sept 2025 → 3 Oct 2025

Natural language search

Ask the way you would ask a colleague.

No keywords, no filters, no folder names. Paměť reads the whole question: the client, the time frame and what you actually want to know. Then it searches accordingly.

  • CZČeština

    Co jsme Novateku nabízeli naposledy a proč to nevyšlo?

    Read as

    Client
    Novatek
    Looking for
    The latest quotation, and why the deal was lost
    Time frame
    Most recent — autumn 2025

  • SKSlovenčina

    Riešili sme už niekedy odložené prepnutie ERP, a ako?

    Read as

    Topic
    A delayed ERP cutover
    Looking for
    A precedent, and how it was handled
    Scope
    All delivered projects

  • ENEnglish

    What should I know about the Prague Logistics Hub project before Monday's meeting?

    Read as

    Project
    Prague Logistics Hub
    Looking for
    Status, open items and the people involved
    Time frame
    Recent first — the last 90 days

  • Follow-up questions

    “And what did they say about price?” keeps the client, the project and the period from the question before it.

  • Relative time

    “Last year”, “before Monday”, “since the handover” are resolved against the dates on the records themselves.

  • Internal shorthand

    WMS, CR-03, Q-2025-0914: the abbreviations and reference numbers your teams already use.

  • No exact titles needed

    You do not need to know what the file was called. Describe what it was about and who it concerned.

Grounded answers

Built from the record, not from a guess.

Grounded means each statement in an answer comes from a document the company actually holds: a quotation, an email, a meeting note. Each statement points back to its record. If there is no record, Paměť tells you.

  1. 01

    Statements trace to sources

    Each part of an answer maps to a specific record. Nothing is filled in from general knowledge or from what sounds likely.

  2. 02

    Dates come from documents

    “14 September 2025” is the date on the quotation, not an estimate. The sequence of events is the real one.

  3. 03

    Silence over speculation

    When the company has no record of something, the answer says so — and shows the nearest related record instead.

  4. 04

    Confidence is shown, not implied

    Every answer carries the number of sources it rests on and the period they cover, so you know how much weight to give it.

With a record

Demo workspace · Example data

What did we last quote Novatek and why didn't it close?

AnswerGrounded in your company’s recordsHigh · 3 sources · Sep–Oct 2025

The most recent quotation for Novatek was sent on 14 September 20251 for the Warehouse Automation project (Q-2025-0914). Novatek wanted deployment within eight weeks2, while the proposed timeline was approximately twelve1. The opportunity was marked as lost on 3 October 20253, with a note to revisit in the first quarter.

Sources

  1. 1Q-2025-0914Commercial quotation — Warehouse AutomationQuotation · SharePoint · 14 Sept 2025
  2. 2Novatek / Warehouse Automation — timelineEmail thread · Outlook · 22 Sept 2025
  3. 3CRM opportunity — Novatek WMSCRM record · CRM · 3 Oct 2025

Without a record

Demo workspace · Example data

Have we ever quoted Novatek for outbound conveyor systems?

AnswerNo record found0 matching sources · 1 related record

The company has no record of a quotation to Novatek for outbound conveyor systems. The only quotation on file for Novatek is Q-2025-0914 (Warehouse Automation, 14 September 2025). It covers WMS implementation, ERP integration and a 24-month support package, and does not mention conveyors.

Nearest related record

  • Q-2025-0914Commercial quotation — Warehouse AutomationQuotation · SharePoint · 14 Sept 2025

Source references and evidence

Open the original. Check for yourself.

Every answer lists the records it was built from. Each reference shows what the record is, where it lives and when it was written. An answer you cannot verify is an opinion; these can be verified.

Sources · 4

Demo workspace · Example data

Hover over or tap a reference to preview the passage. In the product, the reference opens the original record.

  1. 01

    Reference number

    Document IDs are kept as they are, so a quotation can be found by the number people already use: Q-2025-0914, not “that PDF from September”.

  2. 02

    Type and system

    Quotation · SharePoint. Email thread · Outlook. You know what kind of record you are looking at before you open it.

  3. 03

    Date on the record

    The date comes from the document or message itself, so the order of events is the order in which they happened.

  4. 04

    Preview in place

    Hover or tap to see the passage the answer relied on, without leaving the question.

  5. 05

    Open the original

    The reference leads to the original record in the system that holds it. Opening it is subject to your permissions in that system.

Historical context

Not just what was said. What happened next.

Paměť reads records in order. A quotation, the meeting after it, the email that followed and the CRM note that closed the file become one story — so you can ask what changed, and why.

  • “What did the client say after we sent the quotation?”

    Four days later, in the meeting: the go-live date mattered more than the price.

  • “What changed between the quotation and the CRM note?”

    One objection, raised twice: first in the meeting, then in writing. Eleven days after the email, the opportunity was closed.

  • “Has anything happened with Novatek since?”

    The CRM note says revisit in Q1, and the November lessons-learned document cites the case.

Novatek · Warehouse Automation · 2025

Demo workspace · Example data

  1. Quotation · SharePoint

    Q-2025-0914Commercial quotation — Warehouse Automation

    Scope: WMS implementation, ERP integration, 24-month support package. Proposed timeline: approx. 12 weeks from contract signature.

    Paměť readsProposed timeline: about twelve weeks from signature.

  2. Meeting notes · Teams

    Project meeting notes — 18 Sep 2025

    Attendees: Novatek operations lead, AN, MK. Client raised go-live expectations; MK to check whether a phased scope could shorten the critical path.

    Paměť readsThe client raises its go-live expectations. A phased scope is to be checked.

  3. Email thread · Outlook

    Novatek / Warehouse Automation — timeline

    “…our board expects the new line to be live within eight weeks. Twelve is difficult for us to commit to at this point.”

    Paměť readsIn the client's own words: eight weeks, not twelve.

  4. CRM record · CRM

    CRM opportunity — Novatek WMS

    Stage: Closed — lost. Loss reason: timeline. Note: “revisit Q1 — client open to phased delivery next year.”

    Paměť readsClosed, lost. Reason: timeline. A note to revisit in the first quarter.

  5. Document · Shared drive

    Lessons learned — automation opportunities 2024–2025

    Recommendation: ask for the client's target go-live date in the first discovery call; where the timeline is tight, propose a phased scope before pricing.

    Paměť readsThe company writes down what it learned: ask about go-live in the first call.

People and projects

Who knows this client? The record remembers.

Paměť links people to the projects, clients and documents they actually worked on — so a new colleague can find who to ask, and why, without an org chart that is already out of date.

  • Ranked by involvement, not by title

    People are ordered by the volume and recency of their work on an account: emails, meetings, project roles, support tickets.

  • Roles taken from the record

    “Led the account since 2022” and “remains the escalation contact” are read from project documents, not from a job title in a directory.

  • Follow the connection

    From a person to their projects, from a project to its documents, from a document back to the people on it.

People appear through their work records only, within the access rules your company sets.

Who has worked with Argo Systems?

People

Projects

Anna Nováková

Account Director

Related projects

Related documents

  • Q-2025-0914Commercial quotation — Warehouse Automation14 Sept 2025
  • Novatek / Warehouse Automation — timeline22 Sept 2025
  • Project meeting notes — 18 Sep 202518 Sept 2025
  • CRM opportunity — Novatek WMS3 Oct 2025

Example data. Companies, people and documents shown here are fictional.

Multilingual search

Czech, Slovak and English, in the same answer.

One question can have a Czech email, a Slovak contract and an English specification behind it. Paměť searches them together, replies in the language you asked in, and leaves each source in the language it was written in.

  • Names in every case

    Novatek, Novateku, Novatekem. Czech and Slovak decline names; Paměť is built to treat them as one client.

  • Mixed-language threads

    A Czech email that quotes an English specification is read as one conversation, not two.

  • Answered in the language you asked

    Ask in Slovak and the answer comes back in Slovak, even where the sources are Czech or English. The sources keep their original language.

One question, three ways

Demo workspace · Example data

  • Proč jsme u migrace ERP pro Argo Systems zvolili postupné nasazení?

  • Prečo sme pri migrácii ERP pre Argo Systems zvolili postupné nasadenie?

  • Why did we choose a phased rollout for the Argo Systems ERP migration?

Asked in Slovak · answered in Slovak

Rozhodnutie padlo na riadiacom výbore 11. marca 2025. Anna Nováková zmenu potvrdila klientovi e-mailom 13. marca 2025; dodatok k zmluve mal nasledovať.

Sources · in their original language

  • Steering committee minutes — ERP Migration, 11 Mar 2025Document language: EN
  • Argo Systems — potvrzení postupného nasazeníDocument language: CZ
  • Risk register — ERP Migration (v3)Document language: EN

IllustrativeDocument languages are shown for illustration.

Permissions-aware knowledge

Designed so people see what they are allowed to see. Nothing more.

Paměť is designed to answer only from the records a person may already access. The aim is simple: the access rights in your systems carry through to every answer, and an answer does not become a way around them.

Same question, two people

Demo workspace · Example data

“What did we last quote Novatek and why didn't it close?”

Account team member

Sales SharePoint · Outlook · Teams · CRM

  • Q-2025-0914Commercial quotation — Warehouse Automation
  • Project meeting notes — 18 Sep 2025
  • Novatek / Warehouse Automation — timeline
  • CRM opportunity — Novatek WMS

The full answer: the quotation, the objection and the CRM outcome. Four sources.

Colleague outside the account team

Outlook · Teams · project SharePoint. No CRM access.

  • Q-2025-0914Commercial quotation — Warehouse Automation
  • Project meeting notes — 18 Sep 2025
  • Novatek / Warehouse Automation — timeline
  • CRM opportunity — Novatek WMSNo access

An answer built from three records. Nothing from the CRM is used — not the note, and not the fact that a record exists.

  • Inherits existing rights

    Designed to follow the permissions already set in your email, document and CRM systems, so there is no second set of access rules to maintain.

  • Filtered before the answer

    Architecture designed to select only the records a person may see before an answer is composed, rather than redacting it afterwards.

  • Administrative controls

    Which sources are connected, for which groups, and what is excluded altogether can be configured by administrators, depending on deployment configuration.

  • Auditable

    Designed to support logging of questions and record access for administrative review.

Specific controls depend on the deployment configuration you choose. Ask our team about the environment that applies to you.

Security & privacy

Knowledge discovery

Search finds what you asked for. Discovery shows the pattern.

Some of the most valuable questions have no single document behind them. Paměť can read across projects, deals and years and describe what repeats — with the records that show it.

Questions with no single document behind them

  • “Which clients have we promised phased delivery to?”
  • “Which open change requests are older than sixty days?”
  • “Which projects reused the Argo cutover approach?”
  • “Where are we repeating the same mistake?”

Across projects

Demo workspace · Example data

What have we learned from automation deals that stalled in the last two years?

Pattern found

Confidence: Medium4 sourcesTime span: 2024 – Nov 2025
  1. 01

    The client's expected go-live date was shorter than the delivery plan, and it surfaced after the proposal.

    • Novatek / Warehouse Automation — timeline22 Sept 2025
    • Project meeting notes — 18 Sep 202518 Sept 2025
    • CRM report — lost opportunities 2024–20251 Dec 2025
  2. 02

    Timeline was raised before price in each stalled case.

    • CRM report — lost opportunities 2024–20251 Dec 2025
    • Novatek / Warehouse Automation — timeline22 Sept 2025
  3. 03

    The company had already written down the fix.

    “Ask for the client's target go-live date in the first discovery call; where the timeline is tight, propose a phased scope before pricing.”
    • Lessons learned — automation opportunities 2024–202520 Nov 2025

Medium confidence: a pattern across a handful of records, not a statistic. Paměť says so, rather than rounding it up.

Example workflows

Three ordinary weeks, with a company memory.

Paměť is not a destination. It is where a question goes first. Three short examples from the demo workspace.

  1. Sales preparation

    Demo workspace

    Before the second meeting with Novatek

    1. 01

      “What did we last quote Novatek and why didn't it close?”

      Q-2025-0914, the timeline objection and the CRM note: revisit in Q1, open to phased delivery.

    2. 02

      “What exactly did the client say about go-live?”

      The 22 September email: eight weeks, not twelve. The meeting notes: a phased scope was to be checked.

    3. 03

      “Have we delivered a phased scope before?”

      Argo Systems, 2025: a phased ERP cutover, later reused on the Prague Logistics Hub.

    OutcomeThe account team walks in with a phased proposal, the names of everyone who was in the room, and the client's own words.

  2. Onboarding, week one

    Demo workspace

    A new project manager joins the Prague Logistics Hub

    1. 01

      “What should I know about this project before Monday's meeting?”

      Two phases, one handover, two open items: CR-03 unsigned and data-warehouse access pending.

    2. 02

      “Who has worked on this project?”

      Petr Dvořák, Martin Král and Lucie Horáková, with what each of them actually did.

    3. 03

      “What was agreed at the last steering meeting?”

      20 August: outbound on track, reporting slipping, K2 to confirm CR-03 by the end of the month.

    OutcomeBy Friday the new colleague has read the handover note, knows the open items and knows who to ask. Nobody was interrupted.

  3. Project kick-off

    Demo workspace

    Starting a new automation project

    1. 01

      “Have we solved something like this before?”

      The Argo Systems ERP migration and its risk register (v3), with the mitigations that were reused later.

    2. 02

      “What went wrong on similar deals?”

      The stalled-deals pattern: go-live expectations surfacing late. The November 2025 lessons-learned document.

    3. 03

      “Which risks did we record last time?”

      R-07 master-data quality: a cleansing sprint, a phased cutover and a rollback plan per module.

    OutcomeThe kick-off starts from the company's experience, not from a blank slide.

Product interface

Try the interface.

A window like the one your teams would use, running on the demo workspace. Pick a question, open “Why this answer?” to see the steps Paměť took, hover over a source to preview the passage, and click a person or project to follow the connection. The interface follows the language selector in the navigation.

Octopus MemoryPaměťDemo workspace
EN

Ask your company: Who has worked with Argo Systems?

AnswerGrounded in your company's records
Confidence: High4 sourcesTime span: 2022 – Aug 2026

Three people have substantial history with Argo Systems.

Anna Nováková has led the account since 2022 and negotiated the ERP Migration contract. Petr Dvořák managed the migration delivery in 2025. Martin Král designed the integrations and remains the escalation contact for support.

The most recent interaction is support ticket #4821 from August 2026 about reporting performance, handled by Martin Král.

Sources

People

Projects

  • Question bar

    Type the question as you would say it. Czech, Slovak or English.

  • Answer and confidence

    The answer, how many sources it rests on, and the period they cover.

  • Sources with preview

    Every record the answer used, with the passage that mattered.

  • Why this answer?

    The steps Paměť took, in plain language, so the reasoning can be checked.

  • People and projects

    Who and what the answer is connected to. Click to follow the thread.

  • Filters and history

    Narrow by source type, or return to a question asked earlier.

See Paměť on your records.

Book a demo. We'll walk through Paměť with the questions your teams ask every week — and show you what your company already knows.

Book a demoSee how Paměť works
  • EU data storage
  • GDPR-conscious
  • Access-controlled
  • Enterprise-ready